It was adopted
by religions born of Babylon as the mother of their Saviors. How this happened
and why is part of the religious magic that blinds people to reality.
By the time the Catholic Church was brought into existence
by Constantine there had been numerous claims of virgin birth by men of renown.
One such person was Pythagorus. Other philosophers and leaders also added this
to there background.
Krishna was supposedly born of the Virgin Maia (note this is
also Mary). He was threatened by the evil king Cansa and whisked off to Egypt
when an angel appeared to his mother and told her to flee. Hr remained in that
country until the age of 12 when he returned and worked his first miracle, that
of changing water to wine.
This was the same miracle credited to Bacchus who has a
similar fable attached. The origin of it is that the summer sun ripens the grape
and wine follows. The birth of the sun in December would result in the production
of wine in autumn.
Virgin birth defies genetic and evolutionary knowledge and
principles that are proven to be correct. It is impossible to conceive with the
genes of both parents being involved and Spirit has no genes.
The idea of a virgin birth began in ignorance with the
uneducated primordial beings that developed into the human race.
What the forebears perceived, however, cannot be overturned according to most
religious principles. Their descendants might be excused for
accepting it, especially when it is pushed down their necks from birth.
But
what of the scientists and educated people who adhere to it? What excuse have
they for allowing the myth to continue in the face of the damage it does
to the world?
The premise is the birth of Jesus Christ, shown to be a conspiracy by the
founders of the Roman Catholic Church. It was adopted by all Christians and others
in light of the New Testament, drawn up as part of the conspiracy.
So who was Mary? According to Matthew, chapter 1, she is known
only as the wife of Joseph,
whose geneology is listed as descended from Abraham via Judas. Aside from that
we
know nothing of her.
Mark and John know nothing of her and John, 1:45,
describes Jesus
as the son of Joseph. If that is the case then where is the virgin birth?
That
is only the first error in the New Testament story. From here on one mistake
after the other occurs to prove the myth of Jesus Christ and the virgin birth.
Jesus Christ is supposedly descended from Judah via Joseph's line
but that does not stand up genetically. If Joseph was not his father than how
and why would this even become an issue.
According to Matthew and luke Mary is impregnated by the Spirit
of God before she marries Joseph, that is while she is a virgin. The authors
knew nothing about genetics nor the role of genes in the production of a
normal human.
Its a proven fact that no life will develop from cells that
do not have matching
chromosomes from both parents. In the case of cloning
the double helix of genes is present but the genes are identical, and that's
the problem as abnormalities are likely. It involves a
process of self fertilization, known among certain animals, such as
snails, which is not stated in the case of Mary.
The idea of a virgin birth is not confined to this case. Most
indigenous peoples could not and did not understand the
technical side of pregnancy. They knew a woman was pregnant only when her
abdomen swelled and it became obvious. That could be as late as 3 to 4 months
prior to birth.
In fact, the Catholic Church nominates the date of the
Annunciation as that of March 25th. Three days past the vernal equinox. This was
also the time the Romans celebrated Easter, the birth of the 'eye-star' and
also the time of fertility when orgies were held in the streets.
'Eye-star' is also in 'oestrous' for the time of fertility
in the human body. It
is not surprising that the Church maintains it as that of the Annunciation. That
allowed the baby to be born nine months later, which is probably a time when
many of the women of the Empire also gave birth.
Keeping things in accordance with expectations and the
accepted ways the Church used these dates to increase its magic and when chances
of acceptance was heightened.
The technicality of the reproductive system was completely
unknown and women did not associate pregnancy with loss of periods or with the
calendar. Most were illiterate and it was easy for them to accept what the
church leaders told them. Many today are just as ignorant.
That might be difficult for modern women to understand. They
should ponder, however, the problem of those days when multiple partners, the
lack of menstrual periods due to numerous pregnancies, breast feeding, a
nomadic lifestyle where that happened, and
isolation from the main stream of society during one's confinement were all
to blame for it.
Aside from that most were sexually active prior to puberty
in many cases, as is still happening today, and there was no scientific data or
doctors to consult. Only in the well educated families might this have been
different.
Studies of ancient cultures and the images and symbols left
behind give a clear portrayal of the role of the Mother god in creation.
She is Isis in Egypt, Aphrodites in Greece, Astar in Assyria, and Mary in many
other cultures.
'Astar' is simply 'a star' and the sun is the star. 'Ma-r-i'
translates as 'mothers powerful light' and to this day certain tribes
believe that women who expose their bodies to the sun will get pregnant.
This belief was the reason why women of most cultures would
cover their entire bodies. That is still happening even though they now know
that the sun does not make them pregnant.
The Son of God has to have been born of a virgin to assume
the role. The Virgin Mary was put into the religion by Constantine who called
her the Mother of God instead of the Mother God, as she was in Babylon.
And the woman was arrayed in purple
and scarlet colors, and decked with gold and precious stones and pearls, having
a golden cup in her hand full of abomination and filthiness of her fornication.
And upon her forehead was a name written, MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER
OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH. Revelation 17:4,5
The golden cup is, of course, the
challis. The purple stands for the color of the Caesar and the scarlet is that
of her church. The images representing her are decked out with gold and precious
stones and pearls. Many have died in horrendous circumstances when the church
bishops ordered them tortured and murdered because they opposed their beliefs.
Catholic priests marry Mary, which is why they remain
celebrate. This behaviour opposes their natural instincts so many use children
to satisfy their sexual desires. Outside they must look like innocent saints
but inside they are churning up with desires and emotions it is impossible for
them to control. Many of their victims die or commit suicide.
The name of God is Jesus and those who serve the Spirit call
on this name. They opposed the teaching of the church and were often victims of
it.
And I saw the woman drunken with the
blood of the saints, and with the blood of the martyrs of Jesus: and when I saw
he, I wondered with great admiration . . . And here is the mind which hath
wisdom: The seven heads are seven mountains on which the woman sitteth.
Revelation 17:6,9
Roma sits on seven hills and her church
is perched on one of them.
<--Back . . .
Next-->
